I'm saying her narrative is simplistic and fishy given the attribution she gives for a bombing that was not carried out by an explicitly feminist group.
Her sources are her narrative. I gave my own back up a few.
I don't doubt there are destructively radical voices in 2nd wave feminism.
I don't accept the premise that all of these anecdotes of them amount to the entire movement. I can easily do that to any movement in history and create the same distorted view.
It isn't honest and it isn't helpful.
Credits & Style Info
Talk Politics. A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Date: 15/6/11 14:37 (UTC)Her sources are her narrative. I gave my own back up a few.
I don't doubt there are destructively radical voices in 2nd wave feminism.
I don't accept the premise that all of these anecdotes of them amount to the entire movement. I can easily do that to any movement in history and create the same distorted view.
It isn't honest and it isn't helpful.