Regardless, you just assumed that, as usual, and were wrong, as usual. But it still makes your statement ("You actually admit that you might have been wrong after all about why Wiener caved") logically incorrect. Wrong again, my friend. Read the comment thread. It's right below this one.
When pastorlenny gave two possible reasons for Weiner caving, you said, "the second one." I replied, "congratulations, good guess!" To which you replied, "I'm not guessing." In my response to this last comment of yours, I said, "Oh, you know for an actual fact that it was the second one? You can read this man's mind?"
That's the statement to which you didn't reply. The mind-reading part was also my sarcastic response to your arrogant assumption that you weren't guessing.
So when you the said, "I'm sure you're just as good at mind reading as I am, which is to say, not at all," that was when I said "You actually admit that you might have been wrong after all about why Wiener caved after I asked you if you could read his mind when you said you weren't wrong."
The assumption, my friend, was made by you when you stated outright that you weren't guessing. Unless you are capable of actually reading minds, you cannot possibly know exactly what was in Weiner's mind.
You can strawman me all you wish, but I promise you that you will never win. The fact of the matter is, I outdrew you and shot all your arguments down. I will hereby blow the smoke from my pistols, reholster them, mount my horse and ride out of town in triumph. Goodbye!
Credits & Style Info
Talk Politics. A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Date: 9/6/11 07:10 (UTC)Wrong again, my friend. Read the comment thread. It's right below this one.
When pastorlenny gave two possible reasons for Weiner caving, you said, "the second one." I replied, "congratulations, good guess!" To which you replied, "I'm not guessing." In my response to this last comment of yours, I said, "Oh, you know for an actual fact that it was the second one? You can read this man's mind?"
That's the statement to which you didn't reply. The mind-reading part was also my sarcastic response to your arrogant assumption that you weren't guessing.
So when you the said, "I'm sure you're just as good at mind reading as I am, which is to say, not at all," that was when I said "You actually admit that you might have been wrong after all about why Wiener caved after I asked you if you could read his mind when you said you weren't wrong."
The assumption, my friend, was made by you when you stated outright that you weren't guessing. Unless you are capable of actually reading minds, you cannot possibly know exactly what was in Weiner's mind.
You can strawman me all you wish, but I promise you that you will never win. The fact of the matter is, I outdrew you and shot all your arguments down. I will hereby blow the smoke from my pistols, reholster them, mount my horse and ride out of town in triumph. Goodbye!