This just in
6/6/11 17:02Anthony Weiner to the press: I did it.
For discussion: Does anyone want to reassess any part of his or her participation in the previous week's discussion?
For myself: I did NOT wade in last week, but have been inclined to believe Weiner up to this point, largely out of a desire for it to not be true but also from some contradictory information such as a report of an actual expert image analyst who concluded the picture could not have come from Weiner's Blackberry model.
It is also true that I was disinclined because of Brietbart's alleged involvement in circulating the original story (headlines now say he is getting in on the press conference today as well) -- I am not ashamed of that, actually. Breitbart is a bottom feeder of the lowest order and this kind of story would find its way to mainstream sources without his involvement tainting it. Unfortunately, the final outcome of this with Weiner vigorously denying it and then having to backtrack only gives more credibility to Breitbart's ability to try to lead the news. Shame on Weiner for his behavior, his attempts to deny it AND for building up Brietbart's credibility.
Final question: Why the hell do the powerful and influential manage to think they are NOT being watched all the time? It boggles the mind that people who claim they want to do good risk it all with behavior that may be private but is either disgraceful and/or contrary to the standards they claim to uphold? I expect the standard answer is "ha, ha, dirty politicians" but that's actually a problem -- cynical nihilism makes matters a lot worse when there is actual work that needs doing.
Thanks a bunch, Anthony.
For discussion: Does anyone want to reassess any part of his or her participation in the previous week's discussion?
For myself: I did NOT wade in last week, but have been inclined to believe Weiner up to this point, largely out of a desire for it to not be true but also from some contradictory information such as a report of an actual expert image analyst who concluded the picture could not have come from Weiner's Blackberry model.
It is also true that I was disinclined because of Brietbart's alleged involvement in circulating the original story (headlines now say he is getting in on the press conference today as well) -- I am not ashamed of that, actually. Breitbart is a bottom feeder of the lowest order and this kind of story would find its way to mainstream sources without his involvement tainting it. Unfortunately, the final outcome of this with Weiner vigorously denying it and then having to backtrack only gives more credibility to Breitbart's ability to try to lead the news. Shame on Weiner for his behavior, his attempts to deny it AND for building up Brietbart's credibility.
Final question: Why the hell do the powerful and influential manage to think they are NOT being watched all the time? It boggles the mind that people who claim they want to do good risk it all with behavior that may be private but is either disgraceful and/or contrary to the standards they claim to uphold? I expect the standard answer is "ha, ha, dirty politicians" but that's actually a problem -- cynical nihilism makes matters a lot worse when there is actual work that needs doing.
Thanks a bunch, Anthony.
(no subject)
Date: 6/6/11 21:07 (UTC)Why would a man married to such a beautiful and intelligent woman, sleaze around on the Internet, and in this day and age knowing how many people he's pissed off, and could think he would lie his way out of it? I just don't get it :/
(no subject)
Date: 6/6/11 21:09 (UTC)Giggidy-goo.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:LOLOLOLOL
From:(no subject)
Date: 6/6/11 21:09 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 6/6/11 21:09 (UTC)Perhaps neither did he. That's usually what it is.
(no subject)
Date: 6/6/11 21:13 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 6/6/11 21:08 (UTC)Maybe in 40 years we'll have some tech-savvy politicians.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:No, the euphemism treadmill isn't going to stop
From:Re: No, the euphemism treadmill isn't going to stop
From:Re: No, the euphemism treadmill isn't going to stop
From:Re: No, the euphemism treadmill isn't going to stop
From:Re: No, the euphemism treadmill isn't going to stop
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:Re: No, the euphemism treadmill isn't going to stop
From:Re: No, the euphemism treadmill isn't going to stop
From:Re: No, the euphemism treadmill isn't going to stop
From:Re: No, the euphemism treadmill isn't going to stop
From:Re: No, the euphemism treadmill isn't going to stop
From:Re: No, the euphemism treadmill isn't going to stop
From:Re: No, the euphemism treadmill isn't going to stop
From:Re: No, the euphemism treadmill isn't going to stop
From:Re: No, the euphemism treadmill isn't going to stop
From:Re: No, the euphemism treadmill isn't going to stop
From:Re: No, the euphemism treadmill isn't going to stop
From:Re: No, the euphemism treadmill isn't going to stop
From:Re: No, the euphemism treadmill isn't going to stop
From:Re: No, the euphemism treadmill isn't going to stop
From:(no subject)
Date: 6/6/11 21:08 (UTC)Is it a good idea that the penis placement police (or penis picture police) gain so much power over us?
Poor Jon Stewart.
Anyway, it would seem we are judged by our use of time, money, and sexuality.
(no subject)
Date: 6/6/11 21:11 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 6/6/11 21:09 (UTC)On the other hand...
Why is this so important for the general* public, again? Slow news cycle?
_______
* oh wait, the word is self-explanatory; sorry, disregard last question
(no subject)
Date: 6/6/11 21:15 (UTC)He needed time to go through his jpg's and make sure it was his.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 6/6/11 21:10 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 6/6/11 21:15 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 6/6/11 21:11 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 6/6/11 21:13 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 6/6/11 21:31 (UTC)One Weiner to
spamrule us all!(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 6/6/11 21:14 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 6/6/11 21:19 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 6/6/11 21:16 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 6/6/11 21:28 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 6/6/11 21:19 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 6/6/11 21:41 (UTC)Is that a bill in your pocket, or are you just happy to see me? :P
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 6/6/11 21:20 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 6/6/11 22:13 (UTC)OMG... call the capitol police. Breitbart must be blackmailing Weiner or threatening him for him to go along with it. Since everything else Breitbart claimed about Weiner has been debunked this must be true.
(no subject)
Date: 6/6/11 21:20 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 6/6/11 21:32 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 6/6/11 21:35 (UTC)Most responses by the people who were wrong only serve to make me more bitter.
I do appreciate your response though.
(no subject)
Date: 6/6/11 21:40 (UTC)I said healthcare reform would fail for years and years.
[:
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 6/6/11 21:42 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 6/6/11 21:53 (UTC)If you will allow me the indulgence to make a dumbfounding question even more ridiculous, "What makes them think they aren't being watched on a social networking site, which is as good as doing it in the middle of the street, for all intents and purposes?"
(no subject)
Date: 6/6/11 22:02 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 6/6/11 22:09 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:LOLOLOLOOL!!!
From:(no subject)
Date: 6/6/11 22:14 (UTC)I now regret that course of action, and wish I'd made a lot of jokes.
(no subject)
Date: 6/6/11 22:18 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 6/6/11 22:21 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 6/6/11 22:34 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Only in America
Date: 6/6/11 23:37 (UTC)But he can't say that because he's just another scumbag politician whose first inclination is to deny everything, then lie, then make counteraccusations. They're all the same.
Grow up, America. Sex is not evil. It's natural.
Not only in America
Date: 6/6/11 23:45 (UTC)Re: Not only in America
From:Re: Not only in America
From:Re: Not only in America
From:Re: Not only in America
From:Re: Not only in America
From:Re: Not only in America
From:Re: Not only in America
From:Re: Not only in America
From:Re: Not only in America
From:Re: Not only in America
From:Re: Not only in America
From:Re: Not only in America
From:Re: Not only in America
From:Re: Not only in America
From:Re: Not only in America
From:Re: Not only in America
From:Re: Not only in America
From:Re: Only in America
From:Re: Only in America
From:Correct
From:Re: Only in America
From:Oh, for fuck's sake!
From:Re: Oh, for fuck's sake!
From:Re: Oh, for fuck's sake!
From:Re: Oh, for ***** sake!
From:Re: Oh, for ***** sake!
From:Re: Oh, for fuck's sake!
From:Re: Oh, for fuck's sake!
From:Re: Only in America
From:Oh for fuck's sake:
From:And here, I believed....
Date: 7/6/11 00:40 (UTC)Hey, y'know what??
Date: 7/6/11 15:23 (UTC)Just to remind myself and everyone else what he's got and what Breitbart, O'Keefe, and everybody else dumping on him just now hasn't.
Yup.