Link #1 = Sorry can't review blogspot is blocked at work but a persons blog is hardly a solid reference
Link #2 = Failed to prove that this has any support from any member of the Tea Party. The term Tea Party was never mentioned in either the link
Link #3 = Failed to prove that this guy is even a member of the Tea Parties or that his views are representative of them. In fact once again the words "Tea Party" did not appear in the article. Further it was on his private twitter account where he expressed his personal opinion, he was not speaking in his official capacity as a state employee.
Link #4 = OMFG a link which actually uses the term "Tea Party" Unfortunately once again it fails to show what you claim it shows. See you think it says "All Tea Partiers are raving Birthers" when all it really says is "Birther sentiments are more common with those who generally agree with the Tea Parties". It also does not in any way say or imply that ANY actual Tea Party members consider the issue of where Obama was born tbe be of greater importance than the size and cost of government so you still fail.
Link #5 = Jesus Hallelujah you actually hit the mark. Here is a single actual Tea Party member who actually admits to holding birther views (but even he admits Obama was born in Hawaii) This still does not in any prove your point that The Tea Parties are not really concerned with economic issues and the size of the government because you do realize it is possible for people to believe the completely unrelated things at the same time right?
And sorry but I gotta cut it off right there as I have to run to a HOA meeting.
Credits & Style Info
Talk Politics. A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Date: 23/2/11 23:57 (UTC)Link #2 = Failed to prove that this has any support from any member of the Tea Party. The term Tea Party was never mentioned in either the link
Link #3 = Failed to prove that this guy is even a member of the Tea Parties or that his views are representative of them. In fact once again the words "Tea Party" did not appear in the article. Further it was on his private twitter account where he expressed his personal opinion, he was not speaking in his official capacity as a state employee.
Link #4 = OMFG a link which actually uses the term "Tea Party" Unfortunately once again it fails to show what you claim it shows. See you think it says "All Tea Partiers are raving Birthers" when all it really says is "Birther sentiments are more common with those who generally agree with the Tea Parties". It also does not in any way say or imply that ANY actual Tea Party members consider the issue of where Obama was born tbe be of greater importance than the size and cost of government so you still fail.
Link #5 = Jesus Hallelujah you actually hit the mark. Here is a single actual Tea Party member who actually admits to holding birther views (but even he admits Obama was born in Hawaii) This still does not in any prove your point that The Tea Parties are not really concerned with economic issues and the size of the government because you do realize it is possible for people to believe the completely unrelated things at the same time right?
And sorry but I gotta cut it off right there as I have to run to a HOA meeting.