as i said. we have a choice in which companies we want to do business with.
we have the choice to vote in lawmakers that would cut compensation to teachers.
we certainly do.
I think you are not interested in asking the question
i can't speak for the market.
Nobody disputes the basic facts of the situation
you seem to think whats happening in Wisconsin will lead to a material decline in the quality of teachers in the state. the voters of the state don't believe so. it appears to be a difference of opinion.
All I'm saying is that the economic logic is exactly the same.
sure, but its a matter of opinion. at what rate of pay and benefits will the quality of teachers be materially effected? there is no definitive answer. it is a question that voters have to ask themselves when they decide on salaries for public employees. and those kinds of decisions are made through the ballot box.
Credits & Style Info
Talk Politics. A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Date: 22/2/11 02:22 (UTC)as i said. we have a choice in which companies we want to do business with.
we have the choice to vote in lawmakers that would cut compensation to teachers.
we certainly do.
I think you are not interested in asking the question
i can't speak for the market.
Nobody disputes the basic facts of the situation
you seem to think whats happening in Wisconsin will lead to a material decline in the quality of teachers in the state. the voters of the state don't believe so. it appears to be a difference of opinion.
All I'm saying is that the economic logic is exactly the same.
sure, but its a matter of opinion. at what rate of pay and benefits will the quality of teachers be materially effected? there is no definitive answer. it is a question that voters have to ask themselves when they decide on salaries for public employees. and those kinds of decisions are made through the ballot box.