(no subject)

Date: 10/2/11 19:22 (UTC)
e: By your very claim the law is easily usurped, so there is definitely a problem with it.

Your claim is similar to saying that since laws against murder and theft are still sometimes broken, there's a problem with the laws.

e Mine is to take away a known argument, so what is your solution given that enforcement is so difficult?

Except, you see, enforcement is not really that difficult. Many employers often barely even bother to hide the fact that they're discriminating.

Paft; "Most disabled people, most black Americans, who remember what it was like before the passage of those laws will cite them as an improvement -- not an impediment."
e: I never disagreed with that, I just stated what I believe can be done to improve compliance.

Your solution is to remove a protection. Limiting liability is the equivalent to giving major corporations permission to screw their employees -- they'll just pay a small fee for doing it and count it as the cost of doing business.

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Credits & Style Info

Talk Politics.

A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods


MONTHLY TOPIC:

Failed States

DAILY QUOTE:
"Someone's selling Greenland now?" (asthfghl)
"Yes get your bids in quick!" (oportet)
"Let me get my Bid Coins and I'll be there in a minute." (asthfghl)

June 2025

M T W T F S S
       1
2 34 5 678
910 1112 131415
1617 1819 202122
23242526272829
30