(no subject)

Date: 7/2/11 06:41 (UTC)
No, I was exaggerating, but only by a little.

in other words, you were being intentionally dishonest in your assessment.

I disagree that its not the more profitable.

only if you ignore the long and short term costs associated with funding dictators.

provide any kind of quantifiable economic benefit

only if you ignore the role that marketing and perception play in economics.

ensuring that the Suez canal remains in the hands of a friendly government.

thats assuming we have to support a dictator to keep the Suez canal in the hands of a friendly government.

maintaining that control is a lot more important than making Egyptians and Arabs increase their approval of the U.S. by a few percentage points.

probably to the old guard. not so much anymore.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Credits & Style Info

Talk Politics.

A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods


MONTHLY TOPIC:

Failed States

DAILY QUOTE:
"Someone's selling Greenland now?" (asthfghl)
"Yes get your bids in quick!" (oportet)
"Let me get my Bid Coins and I'll be there in a minute." (asthfghl)

June 2025

M T W T F S S
       1
2 34 5 678
910 1112 131415
1617 1819 202122
2324 2526272829
30