(no subject)

Date: 6/2/11 22:09 (UTC)
It seems to me that the difference is that math, physics, chemistry, etc. are verified either by a priori deduction, or by experimentation, so there is less room for dispute in these subjects among professionals working in the field, at least when it comes to the basic knowledge base.

With philosophy, or specifically the study of a particular philosopher's ideas, verification involves consulting and interpreting texts, something which is more subjective.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Credits & Style Info

Talk Politics.

A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods


MONTHLY TOPIC:

Failed States

DAILY QUOTE:
"Someone's selling Greenland now?" (asthfghl)
"Yes get your bids in quick!" (oportet)
"Let me get my Bid Coins and I'll be there in a minute." (asthfghl)

June 2025

M T W T F S S
       1
2 34 5678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30