(no subject)

Date: 6/2/11 21:43 (UTC)
Great. So why is this relevant? I mean, if you're right (and you don't seem to be--a lay audience is no more familiar with specialized claims in math, physics, chemistry, etc. than they are in philosophy, and thus equally susceptible to bs), then this just shows that there's more of a need for quality control in these subjects, not less. So even if you're right (and you don't seem to be), it would only support the oppose of your point.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Credits & Style Info

Talk Politics.

A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods


MONTHLY TOPIC:

Failed States

DAILY QUOTE:
"Someone's selling Greenland now?" (asthfghl)
"Yes get your bids in quick!" (oportet)
"Let me get my Bid Coins and I'll be there in a minute." (asthfghl)

June 2025

M T W T F S S
       1
2 345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30