- Loughner's anti-gov't attitudes are why Loughner decided to "kill someone gov't related" - However, Loughner's anti-gov't attitudes are not why Loughner targeted Giffords.
I assert:
- IF Loughner's anti-gov't attitudes are not why Loughner targeted Giffords, THEN "A person's actions [e.g. Loughner's targeting] can not be explained by any prior action [e.g. Loughner's anti-gov't attitudes] that is not the most immediate, the most present [e.g. Loughner's disdain for Giffords re-election]."
What statment is not equivalent to what statment?
Credits & Style Info
Talk Politics. A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods
Re: List of Anti-Government Characteristics Of Loughner
Date: 14/1/11 02:33 (UTC)- Loughner's anti-gov't attitudes are why Loughner decided to "kill someone gov't related"
- However, Loughner's anti-gov't attitudes are not why Loughner targeted Giffords.
I assert:
- IF Loughner's anti-gov't attitudes are not why Loughner targeted Giffords, THEN "A person's actions [e.g. Loughner's targeting] can not be explained by any prior action [e.g. Loughner's anti-gov't attitudes] that is not the most immediate, the most present [e.g. Loughner's disdain for Giffords re-election]."
What statment is not equivalent to what statment?