There are two types of trolls. The first are Type A: they're ridiculously annoying, but not actually harmful. Then there are Type B: these ones are harmful to the community. So far, while you've been contradicting yourself, saying patently absurd and false things, and being head-slamming-against-wall annoying, nothing you've said has been actually inflammatory or shit-stirring. Ergo, you're Type A, which isn't against the rules, its just annoying.
So I'm not actually claiming you've broken the rules. I'm just saying you're annoying as hell and everything you've posted so far makes no sense, is contradictory, and is wrong, in a way that would be easily proven to be, so you have to know it's wrong. But again, not inflammatory.
As for my "allegations," all I need to point to is the part where you say "Generally a Christian is not going to believe this, since it's a belief opposed by Christian teaching. Conversely it's a belief to be found in many non-Christian teachings." Considering that there are many Christians who believe the apocalypse will happen in their lifetime, and you're citing advanced theological tracts they will never have read, but according to you, they must have, in order to be a true Christian. These are not really allegations, this is a logical conclusion drawn from your own supplied comments. You gave us the rope to hang you with, metaphorically speaking.
Furthermore, you don't determine what is or is not an infraction of the rules. We on the mod staff do, and we're not nearly as rigid and inflexible as you think we are. Lots of stuff slides by without us getting pissed over it. We only step in if there's something serious going on that needs addressing. So before you get on your high horse and start declaring rules violations, maybe you should chill and actually let the mod staff do their job. We're the ones determining violations. Not you.
And on the last note, I don't have to give up any evidence. I have observed your actions in the past and have noted your behavior. That's all I need to do. End of discussion.
Credits & Style Info
Talk Politics. A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Date: 17/12/10 22:28 (UTC)So I'm not actually claiming you've broken the rules. I'm just saying you're annoying as hell and everything you've posted so far makes no sense, is contradictory, and is wrong, in a way that would be easily proven to be, so you have to know it's wrong. But again, not inflammatory.
As for my "allegations," all I need to point to is the part where you say "Generally a Christian is not going to believe this, since it's a belief opposed by Christian teaching. Conversely it's a belief to be found in many non-Christian teachings." Considering that there are many Christians who believe the apocalypse will happen in their lifetime, and you're citing advanced theological tracts they will never have read, but according to you, they must have, in order to be a true Christian. These are not really allegations, this is a logical conclusion drawn from your own supplied comments. You gave us the rope to hang you with, metaphorically speaking.
Furthermore, you don't determine what is or is not an infraction of the rules. We on the mod staff do, and we're not nearly as rigid and inflexible as you think we are. Lots of stuff slides by without us getting pissed over it. We only step in if there's something serious going on that needs addressing. So before you get on your high horse and start declaring rules violations, maybe you should chill and actually let the mod staff do their job. We're the ones determining violations. Not you.
And on the last note, I don't have to give up any evidence. I have observed your actions in the past and have noted your behavior. That's all I need to do. End of discussion.