(no subject)

Date: 29/11/10 21:39 (UTC)
You're absolutely right about the Confederates-- look at what Washington did during the Revolutionary War, the British essentially captured and occupied some of the largest cities in the colonies-- and large swathes of territory in the Northern colonies-- elements that would constitute a traditional victory in any war. Washington hung by a thread until the French and Dutch provided money, and weapons. The British made some silly tactical errors, but then so did the Union forces later on. And had France or Britain stepped in with arms, and diplomatic recognition for the Confederates (and they were extremely close to doing so), things would have turned out differently. ESPECIALLY if Union naval forces started attacking French and British ships that were trying to get cotton from the South.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Credits & Style Info

Talk Politics.

A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods


MONTHLY TOPIC:

Failed States

DAILY QUOTE:
"Someone's selling Greenland now?" (asthfghl)
"Yes get your bids in quick!" (oportet)
"Let me get my Bid Coins and I'll be there in a minute." (asthfghl)

June 2025

M T W T F S S
       1
2 345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30