(no subject)

Date: 18/11/10 23:24 (UTC)
It's a good thing. The best way to allocate limited resources is the free market, where people get to decide how much a particular service is worth TO THEM. As long as everybody gets basic service, what's wrong with have two tiers? The only problem comes if the bottom tier's service is unacceptable. And if it is, well, that needs to be fixed. Forcing the rich to suffer unacceptably poor service is not the way to make things better.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Credits & Style Info

Talk Politics.

A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods


MONTHLY TOPIC:

Failed States

DAILY QUOTE:
"Someone's selling Greenland now?" (asthfghl)
"Yes get your bids in quick!" (oportet)
"Let me get my Bid Coins and I'll be there in a minute." (asthfghl)

June 2025

M T W T F S S
       1
2 34 5 678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30