Account name:
Password
(OpenID?)
(Forgot it?)
Remember Me
You're viewing
talkpolitics
Create a Dreamwidth Account
Learn More
Interest
Region
Site and Account
FAQ
Email
Reload page in style:
site
light
Talk politics.
A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods.
Re: And speaking of fossil fueled based anti-global warming links.... (Reply)
Re: And speaking of fossil fueled based anti-global warming links....
Date:
20/11/10 08:28 (UTC)
From:
yes-justice.livejournal.com
why did it take them 5 years to come up with an argument?
AIRS launched in 2002, they collected data from 2003 on and published some findings in 2008. Why is this suspect?
Could it be that the AGW thing was going so well they simply didn't see a need before then?
So, NASA launched AIRS to satisfy this conspiracy theory?
The government doesn't support scientists with the other view.
Richard Lindzen's work at MIT and with the National Academy of Sciences was all government funded.
From:
Anonymous
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
OpenID
(will be screened if not validated)
Identity URL:
Log in?
Dreamwidth account
Account name
Password
Log in?
If you don't have an account you can
create one now
.
Subject
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
Formatting type
Casual HTML
Markdown
Raw HTML
Rich Text Editor
Message
Credits & Style Info
Talk Politics
.
A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods
MONTHLY TOPIC:
The Scramble for Resources
DAILY QUOTE:
"Someone's selling Greenland now?" (
asthfghl
)
"Yes get your bids in quick!" (oportet)
"Let me get my Bid Coins and I'll be there in a minute." (asthfghl)
Links
Rules for posting
WRITE A POST!
Contact the staff!
This month's posts
Monthly topic...
Friday Lulz :)
Daily Quotes
[Recommended]
[[Hall of Fame]]
Community tags
May
2025
M
T
W
T
F
S
S
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
Re: And speaking of fossil fueled based anti-global warming links....
Date: 20/11/10 08:28 (UTC)AIRS launched in 2002, they collected data from 2003 on and published some findings in 2008. Why is this suspect?
Could it be that the AGW thing was going so well they simply didn't see a need before then?
So, NASA launched AIRS to satisfy this conspiracy theory?
The government doesn't support scientists with the other view.
Richard Lindzen's work at MIT and with the National Academy of Sciences was all government funded.