Re: denial simplistics

Date: 20/11/10 00:58 (UTC)
"that more efficiently undercuts AGW denial than AGW itself."

That depends on the individual point of view on the subject.

"walking outside with a thermometer, and comparing my data to data around the world"

That is what is supposed to happen when they collect data on the subject of temperature.

Below are some links, at least one of which will show photographic evidence of deliberate fraud by a government agency. I'll give you a short statement about each.

The first Shows a map of all the surface stations in the lower 48.
Each is color coded with it NOAA rating.

http://www.surfacestations.org/

The next three show actual pictures of many of those stations. be sure to go to page two of each

http://gallery.surfacestations.org/main.php?g2_itemId=56

http://gallery.surfacestations.org/main.php?g2_itemId=660

This one is to a 30 page PDF file. Much of the first 19 pages are dry but informative reading. Pages 20 - 30 are pics of actual stations around the country.

http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2009/05/surfacestationsreport_spring09.pdf

The thing in common with all the pictured stations is the fact that they are owned or operated by either NOAA or the NWS, both government agencies.



This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Credits & Style Info

Talk Politics.

A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods

DAILY QUOTE:
"Someone's selling Greenland now?" (asthfghl)
"Yes get your bids in quick!" (oportet)
"Let me get my Bid Coins and I'll be there in a minute." (asthfghl)

May 2025

M T W T F S S
   12 3 4
56 78 91011
12 13 1415 161718
19202122 232425
262728293031