The skeptics of man influenced climate change in this forum are starting to irritate me with their assumption that the people (and scientists)who take global warming as a serious problem are morons who don't have a clue about previous historical and geologically researched climate change.
The studies comparing bio/geo/chemical compositions in historical times to modern times are the foundation to this whole debate, so claiming that "we think it is all new" because we don't know better is just blah blah blah, and transforming any form of intelligent discourse to some form of junior college level paper or high school science class.
Credits & Style Info
Talk Politics. A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
denial simplistics
Date: 17/11/10 21:59 (UTC)The studies comparing bio/geo/chemical compositions in historical times to modern times are the foundation to this whole debate, so claiming that "we think it is all new" because we don't know better is just blah blah blah, and transforming any form of intelligent discourse to some form of junior college level paper or high school science class.