You have a talent for bringing together varied threads of argument and weaving them into a disorganized jumble that makes no sense and is near-impossible to understand.
Which wishes are you disrespecting? How does this assist you? Why do you keep capitalizing the "T" in theocratic? I understand that you think the Tea Party is the American Revolutionary Guard, but you do precious little beside toss epithets and make vague references to the Civil War to support this. It's not "extreme" so much as it is "extreme and nonsensical." At least paft is clear about her ad hominem and tu quoque arguments. Yours are just as senseless, but you try to shroud them in copious references to force others to look up your work on Wikipedia.
I was trying to point out that it was amusing that you'd quote, with apparent approval, a guy who thought "extremism in defense of liberty" was opposing the Civil Rights Act.
Credits & Style Info
Talk Politics. A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Date: 16/11/10 22:28 (UTC)Which wishes are you disrespecting? How does this assist you? Why do you keep capitalizing the "T" in theocratic? I understand that you think the Tea Party is the American Revolutionary Guard, but you do precious little beside toss epithets and make vague references to the Civil War to support this. It's not "extreme" so much as it is "extreme and nonsensical." At least paft is clear about her ad hominem and tu quoque arguments. Yours are just as senseless, but you try to shroud them in copious references to force others to look up your work on Wikipedia.
I was trying to point out that it was amusing that you'd quote, with apparent approval, a guy who thought "extremism in defense of liberty" was opposing the Civil Rights Act.