A Tale of Two Cities
4/11/10 18:58![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Boy, what a contrast between President Obama and Senate minority leader Mitch McConnell's speeches after Tuesday's midterm election. Dumping President Obama is McConnell's highest priority (his words, not mine). So this is what America has to look forward to: gridlock. Despite voters saying in poll after poll they want Congress and the President to work together, the message just doesn't sink in.
(no subject)
Date: 4/11/10 23:09 (UTC)Dude, the world hasn't ended yet. Maybe just take a break from this subject and give it a rest for a while. Without even noticing these sort of statements have most certainly been giving ammo to your opponents who are probably sniggering under their breath and who would've probably laughed-out-loud if they weren't still so drunken from the victory party. ;)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 4/11/10 23:36 (UTC)Why should it? The Republicans made it very clear before the election that they had no interest in working with Obama and the Democrats. They promised they would bring the government to a grinding halt (more so than before). Some people contacted by pollsters may have assured themselves that their Republican vote was just a plea to get the parties to work together but they're lying, either to themselves to the pollster or both. If Americans really wanted a situation where the Democrats and Republicans were going to work together, they wouldn't have voted for a slate of Republicans who promised the opposite at every opportunity.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Sometimes no IS the answer.
Date: 5/11/10 00:25 (UTC)Re: Sometimes no IS the answer.
From:Re: Sometimes no IS the answer.
From:Re: Sometimes no IS the answer.
From:(no subject)
Date: 5/11/10 00:58 (UTC)That's because we're talking to Obama and I guess he's just too dense to get it.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 5/11/10 21:38 (UTC)