(no subject)

Date: 18/7/10 19:49 (UTC)
In other words, being a one-trick pony puts you in the unfavorable position in the long run. And with their current manner of doing world politics, it wouldn't be surprising if many of their customers feel relieved to say "More of your gas? No, thanks", eventually. What happens next and how Russia reacts, I dare not to forecast.

In the short and medium term, though, theirs could be seen as the rational position. From their point of view, it would behoove them to leverage their position as Europe's fuel pump, and use their influence to create a political climate that will benefit them once this period ends. They can also use the resources accumulated while they were the top-dog of the petroleum economy to ease their transition into the post-petroleum economy.

Of course, they will do neither of these. Mankind favors the grasshopper over the ant. Everything will end up in a bloody mess, and Malthus will gloat from the grave. How was your Sunday? Mine's going great!
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Credits & Style Info

Talk Politics.

A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods


MONTHLY TOPIC:

Failed States

DAILY QUOTE:
"Someone's selling Greenland now?" (asthfghl)
"Yes get your bids in quick!" (oportet)
"Let me get my Bid Coins and I'll be there in a minute." (asthfghl)

June 2025

M T W T F S S
       1
2 34 5 678
910 1112 131415
1617 1819 202122
23242526272829
30