I don't understand why you're using bit.ly links in this post. Is there a reason for this that I'm not getting?
Recruitment experts say many companies are opting out of so-called passive job seekers for a number of reasons. First, it could take longer to get them up to speed in professions that require constant training. They also say people who have not been laid off are believed to be the best in the fields, therefore more valuable.
From the employer's point of view, this makes sense. At the same time, this reasoning would not apply to all or even most employment opportunities (service industry and retail, for instance, would largely be immune to this reasoning), so this issue is far, far, far from being the cause of a catastrophe.
False alarm.
Credits & Style Info
Talk Politics. A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Date: 2/6/10 05:41 (UTC)Recruitment experts say many companies are opting out of so-called passive job seekers for a number of reasons. First, it could take longer to get them up to speed in professions that require constant training. They also say people who have not been laid off are believed to be the best in the fields, therefore more valuable.
From the employer's point of view, this makes sense. At the same time, this reasoning would not apply to all or even most employment opportunities (service industry and retail, for instance, would largely be immune to this reasoning), so this issue is far, far, far from being the cause of a catastrophe.
False alarm.