b: I've read his book, "Armed Madhouse" and while he has a tremendous amount of base information in there, some of the conclusions he draws are tremendously left field.
Disagreeing with someone's conclusions is not necessarily the same as proving that he's a member of the tin foil hat brigade.
Palast's coverage of voter suppression has been very, very well documented. Nobody familiar with voter suppression history would dismiss his concerns as paranoid or kooky.
Credits & Style Info
Talk Politics. A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Date: 30/4/10 18:16 (UTC)Disagreeing with someone's conclusions is not necessarily the same as proving that he's a member of the tin foil hat brigade.
Palast's coverage of voter suppression has been very, very well documented. Nobody familiar with voter suppression history would dismiss his concerns as paranoid or kooky.