d: no, you said they weren't relevant since they happeneed a long time ago. and you said i was arguing in bad faith.
Yes, citing an example that you know full well is not relevant is a case of arguing in bad faith.
d: and you said any examples of liberal badness would just be obscure or tongue-in-cheek.
Yes, as unfair as it may seem to you, an obscure, tongue-in-cheeki invocation of secession among a small group of academics is not comparable to a dead-serious invocation of secession by a state governor before a cheering crowd.
d: and you accused me of babbbling.
You were.
Credits & Style Info
Talk Politics. A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
Re: no true scotch-liberal....
Date: 27/4/10 17:58 (UTC)Yes, citing an example that you know full well is not relevant is a case of arguing in bad faith.
d: and you said any examples of liberal badness would just be obscure or tongue-in-cheek.
Yes, as unfair as it may seem to you, an obscure, tongue-in-cheeki invocation of secession among a small group of academics is not comparable to a dead-serious invocation of secession by a state governor before a cheering crowd.
d: and you accused me of babbbling.
You were.