(no subject)

Date: 27/4/10 17:53 (UTC)
What you just said right above was:

employers would have to ascertain proof of citizenship, and/or right to work, and that's apparently an affront to human rights in certain circles.

THAT is framed as a solution you're proposing. You going to change stance now when it's right above??
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Credits & Style Info

Talk Politics.

A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods

DAILY QUOTE:
"Someone's selling Greenland now?" (asthfghl)
"Yes get your bids in quick!" (oportet)
"Let me get my Bid Coins and I'll be there in a minute." (asthfghl)

May 2025

M T W T F S S
   12 3 4
56 78 91011
12 13 1415 161718
19202122 232425
26 2728293031