Banks ARE regulated.Therefore, what we're talking about isn't a lack of regulation, but rather a failure of it.
Of course, people being the un-educated sheep they are, they immediately jump on the "we need to regulate banks -- because banks aren't regulated" train.
If government regulation of banks, failed, causing this mess. What makes people think things will be any different with increased government regulation?The consensus fails, here. Then again, it often does.
Credits & Style Info
Talk Politics. A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods
re-post
Date: 27/4/10 02:29 (UTC)1st, banks ARE regulated.
The central bank's purpose is to supervise and regulate the US banking system and dictate policy. Its listed on the Federal Reserve's website:
What are the Federal Reserve's responsibilities?Today, the Federal Reserve's responsibilities fall into four general areas:
http://federalreserve.gov/generalinfo/faq/faqfrs.htm#3 (http://federalreserve.gov/generalinfo/faq/faqfrs.htm#3)
Banks ARE regulated.Therefore, what we're talking about isn't a lack of regulation, but rather a failure of it.
Of course, people being the un-educated sheep they are, they immediately jump on the "we need to regulate banks -- because banks aren't regulated" train.
If government regulation of banks, failed, causing this mess. What makes people think things will be any different with increased government regulation?The consensus fails, here. Then again, it often does.