Re: well bo-hoo

Date: 24/4/10 03:27 (UTC)
Yeah, see, here's the problem.

You might actually have something intelligent to contribute, but the more you talk the less that becomes clear. I will say that the moment someone tells me to 'own up' to their impression of an event by becoming the recipient of their 'truth enema' so to speak ("up the ass"? Really?), it tells me that person is not interested in having that conversation. This goes double for basing said understanding on one or two casual observations and a lot of assumptions about what those observations mean across the board. Forget about the fact that I basically agreed with you on some substantial things, like the composition of the tea parties, and the not inconsequential number of hypocrites therein which I cannot help but shake my head at. No, for daring to not live up to your arbitrary standards, regardless of reason, I have earned your designation as "Patsy" (a formal name now?).

If this is the impression you wished to leave, you have succeeded. However, as I have a low tolerance for such presumptuous condescension, I really don't care anymore what further you might say on the subject.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Credits & Style Info

Talk Politics.

A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods


MONTHLY TOPIC:

Failed States

DAILY QUOTE:
"Someone's selling Greenland now?" (asthfghl)
"Yes get your bids in quick!" (oportet)
"Let me get my Bid Coins and I'll be there in a minute." (asthfghl)

June 2025

M T W T F S S
       1
2 34 5 678
910 1112 131415
1617 1819 202122
23242526272829
30