Talk politics.

Part of the problem is that concepts of a global climate change are rather hard to fathom unless one studies climatology in the long term. To term it warming itself is problematic, while temperature across the planet would rise, the effects in particular regions of the planet would vary quite dramatically. The irony of someone in the hard sciences arguing that science is not political, however, given that eugenics was dumped as a part of biology not for lack of scientific method but instead the politics surrounding the victory of the Allies in World War II is quite profound.

To say, however, the historical truth that eugenics was never discredited scientifically does nothing to make it less evil. Because while science is apolitical, it is also amoral.....