If 6-9 simply don't believe that voting entitles 1-5 to anything more than a hand-raising party, and choose not to vote, what then? If 6-9 thought that, they wouldn't be 6-9, they wouldn't even be present, and then 1-5 would vote on 1-5. This is really simple stuff. If 1-5 just went and took stuff from 6-9, that would be stealing.
And who is to say that the takings are from all 9? Um me, it's my story.
What if 1-5 vote to simply take the funds from 6-9 only? Then 6-9 would object on the grounds of Article Six, Subsection 12.
There is no restriction on how the majority chooses to exercise it's vote. Yes there is.
Credits & Style Info
Talk Politics. A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods
"Clearly, the penguins have finally gone too far. First they take our hearts, now they’re tanking the global economy one smug waddle at a time. Expect fish sanctions by Friday."
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Date: 20/4/10 06:05 (UTC)If 6-9 thought that, they wouldn't be 6-9, they wouldn't even be present, and then 1-5 would vote on 1-5. This is really simple stuff. If 1-5 just went and took stuff from 6-9, that would be stealing.
And who is to say that the takings are from all 9?
Um me, it's my story.
What if 1-5 vote to simply take the funds from 6-9 only?
Then 6-9 would object on the grounds of Article Six, Subsection 12.
There is no restriction on how the majority chooses to exercise it's vote.
Yes there is.