I've asked that question before - if the majority of the group decided to cooperate with each other and agreed to take your money. Is that lawful? You're not understanding what I'm saying: law, as an entity, is something that originates within agreement and cooperation. If you are not acting by agreement and cooperation, you are acting by power and violence. If you are acting by power and violence, you have nothing to appeal to and no argument to make: you have rejected any form of law whatsoever and so act within a vacuum. This means that you cannot accuse anybody of anything because you absolutely lack any ground from which to judge.
Why? Because the group that I am a part of is not obligated to accept my participation or presence without any recourse or agreement. You know, like if I'm on a baseball team, the baseball team has the right to refuse my participation in their team if I don't cooperate.
Credits & Style Info
Talk Politics. A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Date: 20/4/10 04:31 (UTC)You're not understanding what I'm saying: law, as an entity, is something that originates within agreement and cooperation. If you are not acting by agreement and cooperation, you are acting by power and violence. If you are acting by power and violence, you have nothing to appeal to and no argument to make: you have rejected any form of law whatsoever and so act within a vacuum. This means that you cannot accuse anybody of anything because you absolutely lack any ground from which to judge.
Why?
Because the group that I am a part of is not obligated to accept my participation or presence without any recourse or agreement. You know, like if I'm on a baseball team, the baseball team has the right to refuse my participation in their team if I don't cooperate.