The Supreme Court can only rule on things brought to them. It hasn't been brought to them yet AFAIK. Which means they haven't refused it either. Therefore, it's undecided, not Constitutional.
And your statement is logically false anyways. Undecided isn't undecided if the Court refused to hear it, as that's a decision.
Credits & Style Info
Talk Politics. A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Date: 10/4/10 06:40 (UTC)And your statement is logically false anyways. Undecided isn't undecided if the Court refused to hear it, as that's a decision.