(no subject)

Date: 10/2/10 03:07 (UTC)
I'm sorry, but if you don't want to appreciate and accept the importance of semantics in legal scholastics, then do you have anything else to add which isn't facetious or insulting?

I can certainly point you to papers submitted to law journals by law scholars where semantics is a major part of the paper.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Credits & Style Info

Talk Politics.

A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods


MONTHLY TOPIC:

Failed States

DAILY QUOTE:
"Someone's selling Greenland now?" (asthfghl)
"Yes get your bids in quick!" (oportet)
"Let me get my Bid Coins and I'll be there in a minute." (asthfghl)

June 2025

M T W T F S S
       1
2 34 5 678
910 1112 131415
1617 1819202122
23242526272829
30