![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
fridi posting in ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
talkpoliticsThe current conflict involving the US, Israel and Iran has entered a prolonged phase, but one expected development has not materialized: attacks by Yemen's Houthi movement on shipping in the Red Sea. Given their past behavior, this absence stands out.
Since late 2023, the Houthis have repeatedly targeted commercial vessels in the Red Sea, particularly following the outbreak of the Gaza war. These attacks disrupted global shipping and forced major trade routes to adjust. Several shipping companies have erouted vessels around Africa to avoid the risk, increasing costs and delays.
At the same time, the Houthis have demonstrated the capability and willingness to strike beyond Yemen. They have launched missiles and drones toward Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Israel in recent years. This makes their current restraint more difficult to explain as a simple lack of capacity.
One plausible explanation is strategic timing. One school of thought argues that Iran may be holding back its allied forces as part of a broader escalation strategy. In this view, attacks on Red Sea shipping are being kept as a "reserve option" to increase pressure later if needed. This interpretation fits a pattern seen in other regional actors aligned with Iran, who calibrate their involvement rather than act immediately.
The stakes are high. The nearby Strait of Hormuz handles roughly 1/5 of global oil trade. Any disruption there has already shown its ability to move energy prices sharply. If attacks were to expand to the Red Sea, especially near the Bab el-Mandeb Strait, another key chokepoint, the economic impact would likely extend well beyond the region.
Another explanation is more pragmatic. The Houthis may be avoiding escalation due to direct or indirect pressure. The US currently maintains a significant naval presence in the area, increasing the risks of immediate retaliation. There are also indications that regional actors have tried to contain the conflict to prevent broader economic damage. Even informal understandings could be enough to delay action.
Internal dynamics in Yemen may also play a role. The Houthis are not operating in a vacuum, they face ongoing tensions within the country, including rival factions in southern Yemen. Managing these internal pressures could limit their appetite for opening another front at sea.
Overall, the lack of attacks doesn't necessarily signal de-escalation. A more cautious interpretation is that this is a temporary pause. The Houthis retain both the capability and the precedent for targeting shipping, and the strategic logic for doing so has not disappeared. The question is less whether they will act, and more when, and under what conditions.
Since late 2023, the Houthis have repeatedly targeted commercial vessels in the Red Sea, particularly following the outbreak of the Gaza war. These attacks disrupted global shipping and forced major trade routes to adjust. Several shipping companies have erouted vessels around Africa to avoid the risk, increasing costs and delays.
At the same time, the Houthis have demonstrated the capability and willingness to strike beyond Yemen. They have launched missiles and drones toward Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Israel in recent years. This makes their current restraint more difficult to explain as a simple lack of capacity.
One plausible explanation is strategic timing. One school of thought argues that Iran may be holding back its allied forces as part of a broader escalation strategy. In this view, attacks on Red Sea shipping are being kept as a "reserve option" to increase pressure later if needed. This interpretation fits a pattern seen in other regional actors aligned with Iran, who calibrate their involvement rather than act immediately.
The stakes are high. The nearby Strait of Hormuz handles roughly 1/5 of global oil trade. Any disruption there has already shown its ability to move energy prices sharply. If attacks were to expand to the Red Sea, especially near the Bab el-Mandeb Strait, another key chokepoint, the economic impact would likely extend well beyond the region.
Another explanation is more pragmatic. The Houthis may be avoiding escalation due to direct or indirect pressure. The US currently maintains a significant naval presence in the area, increasing the risks of immediate retaliation. There are also indications that regional actors have tried to contain the conflict to prevent broader economic damage. Even informal understandings could be enough to delay action.
Internal dynamics in Yemen may also play a role. The Houthis are not operating in a vacuum, they face ongoing tensions within the country, including rival factions in southern Yemen. Managing these internal pressures could limit their appetite for opening another front at sea.
Overall, the lack of attacks doesn't necessarily signal de-escalation. A more cautious interpretation is that this is a temporary pause. The Houthis retain both the capability and the precedent for targeting shipping, and the strategic logic for doing so has not disappeared. The question is less whether they will act, and more when, and under what conditions.
(no subject)
Date: 18/3/26 21:15 (UTC)Back on topic...thanks for these details. I figure that this mess is rotten enough as it is. The explanation for the Houthis' lack of attacks is probably a mix of the reasons as theorized. For now, anyway.
(no subject)
Date: 19/3/26 05:27 (UTC)