(no subject)

Date: 11/12/09 01:02 (UTC)
The rules of engagement seem pretty flexible.

I mean the huge arsenal of nuclear weapons have been sitting idle for the most part. I cannot imagine a situation where they could be used where collateral damages is kept to a minimum. Just as conventional bombs do not discern. Just as combatant troops often have issues discerning who the enemy is. It's all well and good to have rules of engagement but following them is difficult at best.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Credits & Style Info

Talk Politics.

A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods


MONTHLY TOPIC:

Failed States

DAILY QUOTE:
"Someone's selling Greenland now?" (asthfghl)
"Yes get your bids in quick!" (oportet)
"Let me get my Bid Coins and I'll be there in a minute." (asthfghl)

June 2025

M T W T F S S
       1
2 34 5 678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30