(no subject)

Date: 13/5/19 15:40 (UTC)
johnny9fingers: (0)
I wonder if this is a shift in Andrew Neil's thinking.

Well Peter Oborne (another Spectator stalwart) has done a volte face on Brexit.

The one thing Andrew Neil is, is he is not stupid. Right-wing, deliberately controversial, anti-PC etc; but he is still a journalist operating in a tradition that harkens back two or even three centuries. If he fucked up on that basic metric he'd be chucked out of the Garrick Club and cold-shouldered at El Vino's. (Paxman is another attack dog journalist, but in his case of the centre-right.) We need more Paul Foots in this world; but we don't need any more slightly dim ideologues like Ben (the dog ate my homework) Shapiro. If you're going on a programme with real journalists (even those of the right if they are real journalists) at least do your prep.

Also it's about audience. Ben Shapiro speaks to the "American people". Andrew Neil talks to the British ruling classes. The audience requirements for the American people are very different to those of the UK ruling class; though it is true you cannot talk down to either - for apparently opposite reasons, obviously - though in my opinion both stem from cultural hubris.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Credits & Style Info

Talk Politics.

A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods

DAILY QUOTE:
"Someone's selling Greenland now?" (asthfghl)
"Yes get your bids in quick!" (oportet)
"Let me get my Bid Coins and I'll be there in a minute." (asthfghl)

May 2025

M T W T F S S
   12 3 4
56 78 91011
12 13 1415 161718
19202122 232425
26 2728293031