13/8/09

[identity profile] sophia-sadek.livejournal.com
There are people who believe that domination is a glorious institution. They associate the institution of dominance with freedom and anything opposed to it as subjugation. It is a mindset that has its roots in the institution of chattel slavery. The free dominate and everyone else is enslaved to their will.

When conservatives scream the bloody curse of "socialism," what they truly fear is the end of dominance. The last thing they want is for the emancipation of oppressed people. That poses a threat to their traditional role as oppressors. They fear the unknown condition that waits on the other side of the act of emancipation as a caged lion fears the unknown domain of the wild.

The freedom to dominate is not the only freedom there is. Conservatives have yet to consider the greater freedom that comes when domination is not longer a viable option. The freedom from having to dominate is something outside of their realm of consideration.

What do you hold as a glorious condition? Does it include a hint of bondage?
[identity profile] reflaxion.livejournal.com
Congratulations! You have just been granted sovereignty. As the interim leader of your people, the masses look to you for guidance on how to proceed with the rigorous process of building your government. The parchment and quill pen are in your hand - what will you do?

A building should have a strong foundation, and a government should have strong founding principles. If you had to draft a constitution for your own nation today, what would be the core values that you would base it on? What rights would you guarantee your citizens, and what would you restrict? What would be the role of your government - its rights and responsibilities? What parts of your constitution would be adaptable, and what would be consistent?

Blah blah health care socialism town hall astroturfing birth certificate. Now none of you can say this post didn't get through your search filters, so let's see some ideas.
[identity profile] mcpreacher.livejournal.com
http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/08/12/health.industry.whistleblower/index.html

From Ed Hornick and Elaine Quijano
CNN

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Wendell Potter knows a little something about the health care industry's practices and is not afraid of to speak out as the health care reform debate heats up around the country.

The former vice president of corporate communications at insurance giant Cigna, who left his post, says the industry is playing "dirty tricks" in an effort to manipulate public opinion.

"Words matter, and the insurance industry is a master at linguistics and using the hot words, buzzwords, buzz expressions that they know will get people upset," he told CNN Wednesday.

Now a senior fellow on health care for the watchdog group Center for Media and Democracy, Potter writes a blog on health care reform. He is focusing on efforts to defeat legislation supporting a government health care plan -- something he supports.

In early July, Potter testified before the Senate Commerce Committee, telling senators that "I know from personal experience that members of Congress and the public have good reason to question the honesty and trustworthiness of the insurance industry."

Potter described how underwriters at his former company would drive small businesses with expensive insurance claims to dump their Cigna policies. Industry executives refer to the practice as "purging," Potter said.

"When that business comes up for renewal, the underwriters jack the rates up so much, the employer has no choice but to drop insurance," Potter had said.


In an e-mail to CNN, Cigna spokesman Chris Curran denied the company engages in purging.

"We do not practice that. We will offer rates that are reflective of the competitive group health insurance market. We always encourage our clients to compare our proposed rates to those available from other carriers," Curran wrote.

"People talk about the government takeover of the system ... that's a buzz term that comes straight out of the insurance industry," he said.

A Cigna spokesman would not comment directly on Potter's accusations. Instead, the company released a written statement saying officials agree that health care reform is needed. But the statement went on to say that officials don't see how a government-sponsored plan can accomplish that.

But Potter's concerns fall right in line with the Democrats' strategy of hitting insurance companies hard this summer. Republicans argue that insurance companies aren't solely to blame for the health care crisis, noting that many of their constituents are perfectly happy with the current system.

The Democratic Party is also dealing with a group of fiscally conservative members known as "Blue Dogs" who are worried over the high costs of the health care plans being bandied about.

Slaughter says that the concerns over a government option may be set up to "try and protect one industry" -- referring to the health insurance industry.

Potter insists he has no agenda -- just a deep passion for the issue.

"This is hard to do. It's scary to do something like this. I don't think I'm any more courageous than anybody but I feel I had to do this."

Potter also has said he decided to resign in 2007 after Cigna's controversial handling of an insurance claim made by the family of a California teenager, Nataline Sarkysian.

The Sarkysian family made repeated appeals at news conferences for Cigna to approve a liver transplant for the 17-year-old, who had leukemia. Cigna initially declined to cover the operation, then reversed its decision.

Sarkysian died hours after the company's reversal.


----

While you read this I'll be looking for the story of the insurance companies who label C-sections as pre-existing conditions since women would be more likely to want a second one if they get pregnant again.
[identity profile] underlankers.livejournal.com
The Economist praises the Swedish health care system over the American on issues of incentives.

Article linked here:

http://www.economist.com/world/unitedstates/displaystory.cfm?story_id=13899647

Also....an image worth keeping in mind for defenders of the broken system:



Now, there's something wrong with this picture. See if you can tell me what it is.....

X-posted from my own LJ.
[identity profile] lucy-chronicles.livejournal.com
Yet another email today from Moveon about oh the ever important passage of the damn healthcare bill. (No mention WHY Nevada, particularly VEGAS isn't having any Townhall meetings from our largely dem congressional folks so we're having our own Friday at a country bar inviting them w/ all media present.)

but anyhow, today's missive was about writing a letter to the edit. gee, this is what it is, here are some talking points ANNDDDD you can do it w/ our tool RIGHT from our SITE! So i did. May i encourage everyone to do the same. It is on the local level so seek out the other side.

Any bets if they'll knock me off the list or they're too stupid to even filter later now that it's gone? ha!
--------

Your letter will go to to Las Vegas Review-Journal. Please review and make sure the letter reads as you wish and that the addressing is correct:


Subject: Obamacare
Body: The sheer volume of pleading emails generated by MoveOn.org sent to subscribers in the past few days indicates further that thinking Nevadans are 'scaring' the Government into action - by just saying NO to any further imposition into our Healthcare system.

Really, if The Mustang Ranch could be run into the ground do we really want the other ill-gotten bunch (Politicians, not Prostitutes) handling our truly most private affairs?


Sincerely,
L