Trump's biz dealings with his Indian biz pals at a time he's supposed to be transitioning from businessman to president are already raising quite a few eyebrows, and pointing attention to the potential myriad of conflicts of interest he may be facing in the years to come. 4 to 8 long years in which his detractors may wear themselves out of whining, by the way (they've had quite a kick-start in the first weeks). And for a good reason. This is a unprecedented time in many respects, including the president-elect's blurring of the line between personal and public interest.
What's he going to be, commander-in-chief or real-estate mogul in chief? He's got to make up his mind, and quick.
On the other hand, the most surprising thing would be if anyone acted surprised that this is happening - they've elected a real-estate billionaire mogul for prez, remember? What do you expect from a billionaire mogul?
On the other hand, his former opponent's shady links and ties to persons and organizations with questionable reputations (including nations that she knew for sure have funded America's enemies), might have been the main torpedo that sank her ship. But I digress. Right back to Trump now.
All his nightmare appointments aside (climate deniers for environment, WTF?), this is a guy who has put all his three adult children on his transition team. They're also going to be running his businesses. And this, just for starters. He's got 4 years and 1 month left (at least) to keep it up in the same style, and thus remain in history as the most corrupt president ever. Or not. We shall see. But the first signs are not very promising.
What's he going to be, commander-in-chief or real-estate mogul in chief? He's got to make up his mind, and quick.
On the other hand, the most surprising thing would be if anyone acted surprised that this is happening - they've elected a real-estate billionaire mogul for prez, remember? What do you expect from a billionaire mogul?
On the other hand, his former opponent's shady links and ties to persons and organizations with questionable reputations (including nations that she knew for sure have funded America's enemies), might have been the main torpedo that sank her ship. But I digress. Right back to Trump now.
All his nightmare appointments aside (climate deniers for environment, WTF?), this is a guy who has put all his three adult children on his transition team. They're also going to be running his businesses. And this, just for starters. He's got 4 years and 1 month left (at least) to keep it up in the same style, and thus remain in history as the most corrupt president ever. Or not. We shall see. But the first signs are not very promising.
(no subject)
Date: 21/11/16 15:32 (UTC)When one is asking if the most corrupted president in making, one also could ask if one of the best presidents is making?
(no subject)
Date: 21/11/16 19:24 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 21/11/16 19:56 (UTC)isin making (sorry)(no subject)
Date: 21/11/16 19:29 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 21/11/16 19:56 (UTC)Is there possible conflict of interests? Yes and it means he needs to settle it right. Will he do so? Who knows. Does it mean most corrupted? Right now no indication of that yet. Someone may say he assembles a great team (one might not agree). Does it mean he will be one of the best presidents? Right now no indication of that yet.
(no subject)
Date: 21/11/16 20:12 (UTC)Like I said, I've yet to see corresponding evidence of his impending greatness.
(no subject)
Date: 21/11/16 20:13 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 21/11/16 18:07 (UTC)Mrs. Clinton has shown she is able to spend decades under investigation and survive by being disciplined and leaving as little of a paper trail as possible. Somehow I don't think Mr. Trump will be as resilient. He can't really count on the support of his party either, which is the most dangerous part. His GOP roots don't go that deep and there are quite a few Republicans who would like to see President Pence pardoning a resigning President Trump... or not.
(no subject)
Date: 21/11/16 19:26 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 21/11/16 20:15 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 21/11/16 21:47 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 22/11/16 07:15 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 22/11/16 10:50 (UTC)Okay, okay, I get what you're saying. After FDR, things actually cleaned up. Johnson and Nixon weren't the cleanest folks, but don't compare with the folks who came from the period between The Civil War and WWII. Iran Contra is pretty minor compared with how things used to be.
(no subject)
Date: 23/11/16 13:27 (UTC)Trump has given them all three branches. He will never be impeached while they maintain a majority in either house. And even then his SCOTUS appointees may stick their oar in...
Trump is not immune, but he is well-protected. If however he is convicted of a crime under US laws, the game changes. I doubt that will ever happen either. It's what having the security services in your pocket is for, so to speak.
(no subject)
Date: 21/11/16 20:17 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 21/11/16 20:22 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 21/11/16 20:24 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 21/11/16 20:49 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 22/11/16 07:17 (UTC)Don't know who's hyping what, but some of his appointments are truly cringe-worthy. And I'm saying this as someone who didn't even root for Hillary - or any other liberal, to that matter.
(no subject)
Date: 22/11/16 14:17 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 22/11/16 19:54 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 22/11/16 21:12 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 23/11/16 01:41 (UTC)