[identity profile] ddstory.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] talkpolitics
I'm sure most of us have heard of this already:



Frankly, I'm loving some of the memes that came out of it:



Oh, and of course no one is going to be fired after this gaffe. Quelle surprise.

In other countries, heads of state have resigned over plagiarism revelations (for much higher-rank cases, granted). In the US, it's just another piece of pundit fodder.

From a slightly different POV though, all of this could've been yet another smartly executed media maneuvre. Trump does have a habit of making profit (!) out of seemingly scandalous gaffes. He's Teflon Donald, after all. Whatever doesn't kill him makes his campaign stronger. And everything makes his campaign stronger. Especially controversy. What might've seemed like an incompetent glitch may turn out to be a brilliant move.

It's just a bit too tempting to guess that a lazy writer lifted the best bits of someone else's speech and hoped no one would notice. But on the other hand, the very fact that the whole world is now talking of Melania's otherwise unimpressive and trite talk makes me thing that something else is going on here. Trump could've done this on purpose. Yeah, I know, tinfoil and all that. But his goal has been achieved after all: to supplant the GOP establishment and make this all about him. Mission accomplished!

I can't wait to see this one (NSFW) for First Lady. Ahem.

(no subject)

Date: 25/7/16 00:03 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] oportet.livejournal.com
In other countries, heads of state have resigned over plagiarism revelations (for much higher-rank cases, granted). In the US, it's just another piece of pundit fodder.

I think President Obama and VP Biden are probably thankful we don't take plagiarism too seriously here...

(no subject)

Date: 25/7/16 15:53 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] johnny9fingers.livejournal.com
Don't think Barry plagiarises as much as borrow the cadences and inflections of great speech-writers of yore. From Shakespeare and the KJ Bible through Disraeli, Churchill, and a few Roosevelts.
Churchill stole and quoted shamelessly. As do we all. It is language after all, and pretty much common property (excepting within strictly delimited areas) whether some folk like it or not.

(no subject)

Date: 26/7/16 07:12 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] johnny9fingers.livejournal.com
Well if you're going to use "found" words and sentences it's probably best not to use those that have been spoken by the most recent incumbent in the job you're applying for without crediting her. It merely shows unoriginality rather than research and scholarship.

But to be candid, plagiarism is the least of my worries when it comes to the Donald's bid for Prez.

(no subject)

Date: 25/7/16 16:49 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] oportet.livejournal.com
That's fine - as long as the difference between plagiarizing and borrowing isn't decided by the political leanings of whoever is saying/writing the words.

Whether it's Melania with Michelles words, or Barack with Devals words - I'm for calling both plagiarism, but I'll settle for calling neither that.

Credits & Style Info

Monthly topic:
Post-Truth Politics Revisited

Dailyquote:
"The NATO charter clearly says that any attack on a NATO member shall be treated, by all members, as an attack against all. So that means that, if we attack Greenland, we'll be obligated to go to war against ... ourselves! Gee, that's scary. You really don't want to go to war with the United States. They're insane!"

May 2026

M T W T F S S
     1 23
4567 8910
11 121314 1516 17
1819 2021222324
25262728293031

Summary