(no subject)

Date: 18/3/16 02:12 (UTC)
I suppose because it's easier to pick at minor things than simply admitting a post *is* entirely valid and there's nothing whatsoever wrong with its substance because well, as Frida said, Schadenfreude is a thing and the Internet tends to lead to accentutating the negative as a general rule. At least that's my experience. Granted, interactions mostly limited to Facebook nowadays may skew that point.

If this is in reference to my post in the other thread, I do regret writing the one line and not limiting it to the broader point because that led to a useless jump down a rabbit trail that could have been avoided by just not writing that to begin with.

TBF, whenever Frida, or Nairi, or for that matter most of the posts on here written by people outside the USA are written, there is relatively little to criticize about them in substance because the posts are valid in big and medium picture terms. I personally am not sure how to write "I agree with this" a bunch of times without seeming repetitive and shallow and the posts to me deserve more in-depth responses than that.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Credits & Style Info

Talk Politics.

A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods

DAILY QUOTE:
"Someone's selling Greenland now?" (asthfghl)
"Yes get your bids in quick!" (oportet)
"Let me get my Bid Coins and I'll be there in a minute." (asthfghl)

May 2025

M T W T F S S
   12 3 4
56 78 91011
12 13 1415 161718
19202122 232425
26 2728293031