(no subject)

Date: 26/2/16 07:51 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mahnmut.livejournal.com
I don't know where they've taken these figures from, but the Afrikaans speakers are 7 million native speakers and 10 million have it as a second language.

(no subject)

Date: 26/2/16 08:01 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] abomvubuso.livejournal.com
Some have argued (http://www.mezzoguild.com/korean-language-is-not-difficult/) that Korean actually isn't that difficult.

(no subject)

Date: 26/2/16 12:16 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] policraticus.livejournal.com
German seems an odd language to omit.

(no subject)

Date: 26/2/16 13:54 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] leo-sosnine.livejournal.com
Yeah, also noticed that. Something is off with this infographic

(no subject)

Date: 26/2/16 14:47 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] leo-sosnine.livejournal.com
Nope, it talks even Afrikaans which is a sort of a dialect of Dutch and not mentions German at all. It would be a stretch to think that the authors missed German because "there are so many languages in the world".

(no subject)

Date: 26/2/16 15:51 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] htpcl.livejournal.com
> I'm guessing they wanted to include a language from Africa for the sake of diversity

By this logic, Swahili would've been a far more appropriate pick. Just sayin'.

(no subject)

Date: 26/2/16 15:52 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] htpcl.livejournal.com
Shrug.

(no subject)

Date: 26/2/16 16:06 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] leo-sosnine.livejournal.com
Don't want to proceed to other things that I could nitpick on without first resolving this one.

All the languages you mentioned are from either 2nd or 3rd category, while German you'd expect to be in the first one. And yet it's not there.

Also, I think we can assume that this infographic was created for a western audience, therefore, it would make sense to mention primarily those languages that westerners interact with more often, that's probably why we don't see Telugu or other weird languages here. Apparently, German isn't such a language as its speakers contributed a lot to a western civilization and majority of Americans are of German origin. Still, it's not there.

(no subject)

Date: 26/2/16 17:19 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] luvdovz.livejournal.com
You've found a problem to resolve, eh?

Gimme a break, LOL.

(no subject)

Date: 26/2/16 16:33 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] policraticus.livejournal.com
I get that, but it just seems to me that if you asked a random person, "name four European-based languages," they would almost always include German in the list.

(no subject)

Date: 26/2/16 17:14 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dreamville-bg.livejournal.com
Heh. I can see how Slavic languages would appear difficult for people speaking Germanic or Romance languages. We've got some pretty weird archaic things still remaining in our grammar.

(no subject)

Date: 27/2/16 00:13 (UTC)
garote: (machine)
From: [personal profile] garote
English should be on that list.

... For the sake of some people I met in the midwest ;)

Credits & Style Info

Talk Politics.

A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods

DAILY QUOTE:
"The NATO charter clearly says that any attack on a NATO member shall be treated, by all members, as an attack against all. So that means that, if we attack Greenland, we'll be obligated to go to war against ... ourselves! Gee, that's scary. You really don't want to go to war with the United States. They're insane!"

March 2026

M T W T F S S
       1
2345 678
910 1112 1314 15
1617 1819 202122
2324 2526 272829
3031