(no subject)

Date: 24/5/15 20:16 (UTC)
From the perspective of urban planning, it's a social and architectural horror to remove a historical part of the city and replace with a mega business district, no matter how much the project is valued. After a couple of decades half the offices are empty because these buildings were built as an "investment" in the first place, and not based on verifiable local needs. The sidewalks around "skyscrapers" tend to become barren, dirty and devoid of any social activities. I bet there are more than plenty shopping malls in Belgrade already. It would be much wiser if the city knew how to manage and create value locally rather than looking for large foreign investment influxes.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Credits & Style Info

Talk Politics.

A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods


MONTHLY TOPIC:

Failed States

DAILY QUOTE:
"Someone's selling Greenland now?" (asthfghl)
"Yes get your bids in quick!" (oportet)
"Let me get my Bid Coins and I'll be there in a minute." (asthfghl)

June 2025

M T W T F S S
       1
2 34 5 678
910 1112 131415
1617 1819202122
23242526272829
30