[identity profile] underlankers.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] talkpolitics
Let us say, in theory, that there is a state with a dysfunctional system of government riddled by oligarchs that happen to monopolize power in a culture of corruption, creed, nepotism, hookers, blackjack, and blow.
This culture promotes things like http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/09/02/jan-brewer-arizona-govern_2_n_703251.html local elites that have connections to privatized prisons, while piously mouthing slogans of defense of the common wealth even as the only wealth that matters is that which greases their slimy palms. This is a culture that openly espouses, with the aid of foreign elites, privatized sections where its military intelligence types torture people with zero accountability, whether on the part of the torturers or their enabers: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/dec/09/cia-torture-report-europe-complicity-britain. This is a culture, furthermore, that nullifies entire swathes of civil rights guarantees protecting vulnerable minorities subject to wide-scale terrorism by the same corrupt local elites without strict controls to make this act like a society of laws, not the nearest howling mob with a noose and a hard-on for posing for pictures beneath burnt corpses: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/26/us/supreme-court-ruling.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0.

This, furthermore, is a culture that produces such phenomena as http://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2015/01/07/the-nypds-work-stoppage-is-costing-the-city-lots-of-money-thats-great-for-new-yorkers/ police forces engaging less as law enforcement and more as taxation of the sort of government-mandated theft that 'small government' types in said culture of corruption are not only mum about but ride to power and popular acclaim in said dysfunctional political culture. http://gawker.com/arraignments-in-nyc-plummet-as-nypd-work-stoppage-con-1678323208 <-This same pattern also leads some of the largest and most famous local law enforcement agencies to engage in blackmail over labor disputes and the personal pique of overmighty subjects trying to throttle a city the size of a small state. http://gawker.com/arraignments-in-nyc-plummet-as-nypd-work-stoppage-con-1678323208.

Finally, this is a culture that openly espouses the virtue of its own right to do precisely what it treats as a hostile act when other countries do it: http://www.worldaffairsjournal.org/article/first-strike-us-cyber-warriors-seize-offensive, which is the largest arms trader in the entire world, meaning much of the stuff that kills people dead comes from this state, http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/27/world/middleeast/us-foreign-arms-sales-reach-66-3-billion-in-2011.html, and which refuses to hold its own elites accountable to these callous and inhuman acts: http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2014/12/09/justice-cia-torture/20138065/.

Which country is this?

The United States of America.

So what is the lesson here? That the category of rogue state has less to do with the deeds these states and their ruling classes do and set out to do, and with the culture these states create and rely upon, and much more to do with these states lacking strong sugar daddies among the superpowers and the great powers, to a point where their actions are not ones that can be easily excused. By any traditional standard, the state here would meet most of the criteria that earn Iran and North Korea these categories, including the whole culture of corruption, reliance on creating much of the problems it seeks to archly condemn, and resolute belief that rule of law is something that happens to other people. Yet because this is not the global enemy as currently defined by geopolitics, it gets away with all this because the real lesson is that might makes right in politics, and that much of the rhetoric about 'dealing with problems of rogue states' is a euphemism for the Vae Victis rule and its often lethal applications.

So, in other words, if a chronic culture of corruption, violence, and arms trading to nasty and unpleasant types, as well as torturing its own and other people is enough to earn some democracy via the crash of the bomb for Iraq, who will bell the cat in this case? Is the rule of law actually meaningful, or just a mass pretense that the powerful pretend to agree to until they have a challenge that requires them to actually do it, at which point they balk?

(no subject)

Date: 9/1/15 22:05 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mahnmut.livejournal.com
Preach it, bro!

You were being missed. So much...

(no subject)

Date: 9/1/15 22:56 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] badlydrawnjeff.livejournal.com
This reminds me of the constant "Bush is a fascist because I can make policies of the Bush administration fit into this list found on the internet."

Once you cut through a lot of the noise, we do pretty well as a nation, even if we have faults. It doesn't mean we can't do better, but it doesn't mean we need some "better" nation to come and rescue us or that there's somehow a wide failure of the rule of law in play.

(no subject)

Date: 9/1/15 23:15 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] badlydrawnjeff.livejournal.com
The difference is that we, with few exceptions, actually have some sort of accountability measures in place in house.

(no subject)

Date: 9/1/15 23:20 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] badlydrawnjeff.livejournal.com
Even putting aside whatever debates there may be about the classifications, lobbyist isn't exactly what we'd call a promotion from government work. It's what you do when government work isn't there for you anymore.

(no subject)

Date: 11/1/15 08:13 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mahnmut.livejournal.com
"Some sort" being the key word here.

(no subject)

Date: 11/1/15 12:18 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] badlydrawnjeff.livejournal.com
Right, compared to the nations that have none at all.

(no subject)

Date: 11/1/15 15:13 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mahnmut.livejournal.com
If you really insist to use failed states, rogue states and/or dictatorships as your measuring stick, go ahead, who am I to stop you.

(no subject)

Date: 11/1/15 15:30 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] badlydrawnjeff.livejournal.com
Correct me if I'm wrong, but that appears to be the entire point of this post.

(no subject)

Date: 11/1/15 15:34 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mahnmut.livejournal.com
So you agree that this is a legitimate metric that the US should use for itself? "The terrorists do this and this, so why can't we do it too".

That's cute, you know.

(no subject)

Date: 11/1/15 15:38 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] badlydrawnjeff.livejournal.com
I'll direct you back to my first comment, in this case.

(no subject)

Date: 11/1/15 15:39 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mahnmut.livejournal.com
And I, to mine.

Might makes right

Date: 10/1/15 01:49 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] geezer-also.livejournal.com
Sorry dude, but that's the way it is...

Do you have suggestions or solutions, as to what WE should try to do, or are you content to be a "voice crying in the wilderness"?

(no subject)

Date: 10/1/15 08:52 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] htpcl.livejournal.com
Gee dude, you got DQ'ed twice in a day! :-)

(no subject)

Date: 11/1/15 08:15 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] luvdovz.livejournal.com
"It's just the way it is" has always been the most piss-poor parody of an excuse.

As long as there's a sufficient number of people employing this sort of mindset, indeed, nothing will be done. Truth is, most people can't care enough to move a finger beyond the occasional tweet on the occasional #ILikeFreedom hashtag, or a selfie posing with a touching message on a piece of cardboard..
Edited Date: 11/1/15 08:16 (UTC)

In context

Date: 22/1/15 15:12 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] geezer-also.livejournal.com
Since I agree with everything you wrote, I'm at a loss as to why you chose to take one part of my comment to go off on a diatribe. As a stand alone sentence (which it wasn't, hence the ...) it is pretty much a truism, not in any way to be taken as an excuse for anything.
I could give you the benefit of the doubt and make the assumption that your second paragraph was not necessarily aimed at me; but given our past interactions I am reluctant to do so ;).

(no subject)

Date: 22/1/15 19:28 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] luvdovz.livejournal.com
The "..." is indicative of context? Ookaay.

You can do whatever you want, you know that. And so can I.

(no subject)

Date: 10/1/15 11:09 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sandwichwarrior.livejournal.com
Stop bitching about non-scandals, the US only meets those criteria when a Republican in the white house.

:P

Credits & Style Info

Talk Politics.

A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods

DAILY QUOTE:
"The NATO charter clearly says that any attack on a NATO member shall be treated, by all members, as an attack against all. So that means that, if we attack Greenland, we'll be obligated to go to war against ... ourselves! Gee, that's scary. You really don't want to go to war with the United States. They're insane!"

January 2026

M T W T F S S
    12 34
5 678 91011
12 131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031