(no subject)

Date: 8/1/15 22:12 (UTC)
I haven't argued that something should not be allowed. Only that most actions have consequences, sometimes consequences that are known well in advance, and are even intended. I believe that a sophisticated society is capable of handling these consequences, whatever they might be.

Ultimately, there are laws. And if someone feels they've been wronged under those laws, they can use the instruments of a lawful state to challenge the perceived offense, and get a chance of being defended by said law. If the court decides that no wrongdoing has been done, so be it. That's how it's done in civilized societies, after all.

Mind you, some people are not concerned about being condemned, either because they're sociopaths or because they have a strong support from within their own community, which tends to compensate the relative backlash that their action might've caused in the rest of society (that pastor, for example). That's where the judicial system steps in. The purpose here is not to have a chilling effect and silence people from expressing whatever bigotry they might be harboring, but rather to provide an avenue for people who feel they've been wronged, to seek justice for whatever wrongdoings they believe have been committed against them.

That said, taking a machine-gun and starting to massacre people is out of the question. It's Medieval and has no place in these societies, period.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Credits & Style Info

Talk Politics.

A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods


MONTHLY TOPIC:

Failed States

DAILY QUOTE:
"Someone's selling Greenland now?" (asthfghl)
"Yes get your bids in quick!" (oportet)
"Let me get my Bid Coins and I'll be there in a minute." (asthfghl)

June 2025

M T W T F S S
       1
2 34 5 678
910 1112 131415
1617 1819202122
23242526272829
30