RE: Not a typo.

Date: 15/11/14 21:56 (UTC)
OK, even accepting that there will only be 15 people fully employed in maintenance,inspection, and upkeep on the pipeline itself*; why are not the jobs at the shipping point, and at the refineries counted? I mean, seriously, there won't be increased employment at the production end?

One positive aspect, these are shovel ready jobs that aren't paid for by the government ;)
(the 15K-45K, (depending on whose analysis you accept) temporary jobs)

*Honestly, I know people who do inspection and maintenance on water, and natural gas pipe lines here in So Cal, and they have way more OFFICE personnel then that; but then we have some pretty powerful unions out here. :D







This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Credits & Style Info

Talk Politics.

A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods

DAILY QUOTE:
"Someone's selling Greenland now?" (asthfghl)
"Yes get your bids in quick!" (oportet)
"Let me get my Bid Coins and I'll be there in a minute." (asthfghl)

May 2025

M T W T F S S
   12 3 4
56 78 91011
12 13 1415 161718
19202122 232425
26 2728293031