(no subject)

Date: 9/4/14 18:24 (UTC)
You say zoos are not conservation parks, and yet, just a couple of comments earlier you essentially advocate for an "au natural" approach for the sake of making zoos less "boring". Conservation parks place animals in an environment as close to their natural habitat as possible. They run and fight and poop and have sex and chase each other, and yes, kill each other and eat each other. This is what happens inside a conservation park. So which is it? If the zoo should be more "au natural", then shouldn't animals be killing each other and eating each other in the zoo as well? And if yes, then why are zoos nothing like that? (Well, most of them).
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Credits & Style Info

Talk Politics.

A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods

DAILY QUOTE:
"Clearly, the penguins have finally gone too far. First they take our hearts, now they’re tanking the global economy one smug waddle at a time. Expect fish sanctions by Friday."

July 2025

M T W T F S S
  123 456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031