First, I'm not going to measure levels of provocativeness and cancel one out with another; and secondly, I did hassleaddress (http://talk-politics.livejournal.com/1823207.html?thread=144723175#t144723175) them, as I'm addressing you now. Sadly, instead of owning up to the jab you made, acknowledging that perhaps it wasn't the best part of this exchange and moving on, you prefer to divert the attention to what happened elsewhere, which is very poor judgment in my opinion.
So, to get back to the question, other than riling up your interlocutor, what other purpose do you believe your remark serves?
Credits & Style Info
Talk Politics. A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Date: 9/2/14 18:47 (UTC)hassleaddress (http://talk-politics.livejournal.com/1823207.html?thread=144723175#t144723175) them, as I'm addressing you now. Sadly, instead of owning up to the jab you made, acknowledging that perhaps it wasn't the best part of this exchange and moving on, you prefer to divert the attention to what happened elsewhere, which is very poor judgment in my opinion.So, to get back to the question, other than riling up your interlocutor, what other purpose do you believe your remark serves?