[identity profile] airiefairie.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] talkpolitics
Andrey Lugovoy is a former agent of the Russian intelligence services, now turned businessman. He was the one who was suspected for the murder of Russian spy Alexander Litvinenko in London (the polonium poisoning case). Back in 2006 this scandal brought the relations between Britain and Russia to a new low. The British government demanded that the suspect be extradited to London. The row ended with Lugovoy getting immunity after he was elected MP at the Russian Duma. Now he's virtually untouchable. And he has found a new cause to fight for, and a new enemy of the state to combat: political trouble-makers in the Internet.

Russia to block websites that call for rioting, ‘extremism’ without court ruling

Lugovoy, who is from the party of well-known far-right populist Vladimir Zhirinovski, has now authored a bill that would severely tighten the laws regulating the Internet in Russia. And it is scheduled to take effect just in time for the Sochi Olympics, on February 1. The new law would expand the prerogatives of the security services, which would be able to block websites under the pretext of trying to counter extremism and child pornography (the "protect the children" meme that Putin seems so fond of, lately). But the way the law is phrased, it would also allow to prosecute those calling for protest actions. The social networks have been very helpful in organising popular dissent lately, and the authorities now seem eager to address that threat. After any call for protests in Facebook for example, the telecommunications service will be able to request a full blockade of the entire network in the country, unless the host complies with the order to remove the "disruptive" content.

So in the future, this sign will be getting displayed ever more frequently across users' screens:


Ever since his re-election in 2012, Putin has been expanding his control on the Internet. The presidential elections were surrounded with protests that were mainly coordinated through the social networks. So immediately after the vote, Putin started tightening his grip. In fact the first version of this restrictive law was adopted in the very first months after he came back to the presidential chair.

Facebook has gained enormous popularity in Russia during the protests. The secret services soon realised that they had no idea how to counter the influence of the foreign web providers. Until then, the debates were mostly gravitating around Russian websites such as Livejournal itself, which the Russian services have already gained access to, after it was bought by a Russian company. Now the censorship law will mostly serve as a tool for forcing foreign providers such as FB and Google to cooperate.


According to the latest World Press Freedom Index update, Russia has slipped 6 positions down, and currently occupies #148. Granted, last year the Kremlin shocked quite a few people when they granted asylum to Edward Snowden (there have been claims that he had actually worked as a Russian spy, an unconfirmed allegation which he of course denies). But, while many Russians may or may not indeed view Snowden as some kind of hero, in fact his stay in Russia has not shown any positive effects on the freedom of information in the country. Just on the contrary: the pro-government politicians are now using Snowden's revelations as an excuse to tighten control on the Internet while they still can. The pretext is the protection of the personal data of the Russian citizens from "foreign corporations" (read: US spies). In fact, it seems Snowden has inspired the Russian intelligence services to update their systems in such a way that they have become hard to distinguish from NSA at this point.

(no subject)

Date: 29/1/14 17:32 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sophia-sadek.livejournal.com
I think it is interesting that Russia already bans sites that "promote" suicide. It would be fascinating to see exactly which sites have been targeted under this rubric. I wonder if it includes anyone who advocates for the right to die. Taking an extremely intolerant stand on extremism reminds me of the old joke that all extremists should be shot.

Speaking of Snowden and extremism, have you seen that he has recently been jeered at by people who would like to see him assassinated? People who advocate such actions might want to reconsider their position. I would not want to be a family member or close friend of someone who advocates such an extreme position, especially regarding someone as admired as Snowden.

(no subject)

Date: 29/1/14 18:21 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] htpcl.livejournal.com
Reminds me of such absurdities like the fact that FB is practically banned in Iran, but ayatollah Khamenei has a FB account. LOL.

(no subject)

Date: 30/1/14 02:59 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] peristaltor.livejournal.com
This (http://thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/01/22/ominous-text-message-sent-to-protesters-in-kiev-sends-chills-around-the-internet/?_php=true&_type=blogs&_r=0) is a real worry. To me, at least.

Image

. . . protesters and journalists standing in the vicinity of fighting between the riot police and demonstrators in Kiev on Tuesday received an ominous text message on their phones: “Dear subscriber, you are registered as a participant in a mass disturbance.”

(no subject)

Date: 30/1/14 07:44 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] abomvubuso.livejournal.com
The Russian government has been selectively blocking (http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/01/technology/russia-begins-selectively-blocking-internet-content.html?_r=0) internet content for quite a while. They've been twisting arms all across the blogosphere for years. Now they're aiming to institutionalise this policy.

(no subject)

Date: 30/1/14 17:52 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sophia-sadek.livejournal.com
Knowledge is power.

(no subject)

Date: 30/1/14 17:54 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sophia-sadek.livejournal.com
Big brother is watching.

(no subject)

Date: 30/1/14 17:58 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sophia-sadek.livejournal.com
I like the case of the video that demonstrates faking a suicide wound. Not only is promoting suicide banned, but anything relating to it tangentially could be targeted. I wonder if they would ban this song:

(no subject)

Date: 30/1/14 18:00 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] abomvubuso.livejournal.com
Or any song by any gothic-metal band.

(no subject)

Date: 30/1/14 18:06 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sophia-sadek.livejournal.com
I could understand why the Russians would ban those songs. They tend to induce an urge to commit suicide. Some might argue that Bee Gees songs should get equal treatment.

(no subject)

Date: 30/1/14 18:12 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] abomvubuso.livejournal.com
Wouldn't it make more sense if the Russian authorities actually encouraged individuals that are obviously "worthless" for society (from the official standpoint of the authorities, anyway), to commit suicide and rid the rest of society of their presence? This way only the loyal subjects of the regime would remain, the useful bits in the machine that would allow it to operate flawlessly. For the glory of Dear Leader and his clique of friendly oligarchs, of course.
Edited Date: 30/1/14 18:13 (UTC)

(no subject)

Date: 30/1/14 18:15 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] htpcl.livejournal.com
Not really:



Apparently, power is power.

(no subject)

Date: 30/1/14 18:17 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] htpcl.livejournal.com
...And a small man can cast a very large shadow.

(no subject)

Date: 30/1/14 18:24 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sophia-sadek.livejournal.com
When people feel that their lives are so worthless that they must head for the dirt nap, it proves that society and its governing authority have failed in their social responsibilities. This is the ultimate reason to criminalize suicide and anything that affirms it.

(no subject)

Date: 30/1/14 18:28 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sophia-sadek.livejournal.com
Be careful who you blackmail, and how.

(no subject)

Date: 30/1/14 18:30 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] abomvubuso.livejournal.com
I suspect criminalising suicide has more to do with a twisted understanding of moral dogma and its importance for sustaining established authority.

(no subject)

Date: 30/1/14 18:35 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] abomvubuso.livejournal.com
Seeing Littlefinger getting pwned is a pretty rare sight indeed.

(no subject)

Date: 30/1/14 18:35 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] htpcl.livejournal.com
And yet, he keeps paddling on.

Oh wait. Wasn't that Varys?

(no subject)

Date: 30/1/14 18:38 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sophia-sadek.livejournal.com
That moral dogma has a basis in reason, whether fundamentalists recognize it or not. Much of the "God wants you to..." hooey is actually a rather thin disguise for "We want you to..."

BTW, a close reading of the Bible indicates that Jesus committed suicide by proxy when he thumbed his nose at the people in charge and encouraged a member of his security circle to sell him out for thirty pieces of silver.

(no subject)

Date: 30/1/14 18:49 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] abomvubuso.livejournal.com
If you say so.

(no subject)

Date: 30/1/14 19:00 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sophia-sadek.livejournal.com
Don't take my word for it.