(no subject)

Date: 8/10/13 08:43 (UTC)
I wouldn't imagine it would reduce too much. I'm not convinced that the private sector would do things cheaper than NASA, but even if they did, there's only so much "waste" that quite possibly the most efficient government department in the USA would be able to do away with. You still need a metric fucktonne of rocket fuel. That virgin galactic thing is still twice as far from the ISS as it is to Earth.

I haven't heard of the vacuum tubes thing. Sounds like the world's biggest amp :P
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Credits & Style Info

Talk Politics.

A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods


MONTHLY TOPIC:

Failed States

DAILY QUOTE:
"Someone's selling Greenland now?" (asthfghl)
"Yes get your bids in quick!" (oportet)
"Let me get my Bid Coins and I'll be there in a minute." (asthfghl)

June 2025

M T W T F S S
       1
2 34 5 678
910 1112 131415
1617 1819 202122
23242526272829
30