Bullshit! Failure to support the remediation policy being discussed makes one a "denier" Full Stop.
Bullshit on that call of bullshit! Some points in my favor:
There is no remediation policy;
There is no remediation policy; and finally,
There is no remediation policy!
Yes, there is recognition that we need to reduce carbon emissions (which no one knows how to do without destroying the current economic configuration) and some how sequester—suck up and lock away—what's already in the air (the many methods of which my link addresses, meaning there is no agree path to take). Beyond that, this is new, new, new, and hardly decided.
A "denier" is someone who denies, as in the AGW problem, not the solution. So far, there is no solution, at least not one universally recognized as the best way to go.
Again, I don't know who/what you're listening to to get to this conclusion, but I would strongly advise skepticism. I am in fact curious to know who is so widely disseminating such blatant bullshit.
Credits & Style Info
Talk Politics. A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Date: 11/9/13 18:25 (UTC)Bullshit on that call of bullshit! Some points in my favor:
Yes, there is recognition that we need to reduce carbon emissions (which no one knows how to do without destroying the current economic configuration) and some how sequester—suck up and lock away—what's already in the air (the many methods of which my link addresses, meaning there is no agree path to take). Beyond that, this is new, new, new, and hardly decided.
A "denier" is someone who denies, as in the AGW problem, not the solution. So far, there is no solution, at least not one universally recognized as the best way to go.
Again, I don't know who/what you're listening to to get to this conclusion, but I would strongly advise skepticism. I am in fact curious to know who is so widely disseminating such blatant bullshit.