(no subject)

Date: 30/6/13 21:40 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wight1984.livejournal.com
Wouldn't it be easier and better to just have that as the legal default?

Why have it as an invoked right when you could have it as a passive right that always belongs to you?

Re-affirming through speech is great and everything, but I wouldn't want that to be a requirement of having a right.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting
 
Notice: This account is set to log the IP addresses of people who comment anonymously.
Links will be displayed as unclickable URLs to help prevent spam.

Credits & Style Info

Talk Politics.

A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods


MONTHLY TOPIC:
Failed States

DAILY QUOTE:
"Someone's selling Greenland now?" (asthfghl)
"Yes get your bids in quick!" (oportet)
"Let me get my Bid Coins and I'll be there in a minute." (asthfghl)

Links

June 2025

M T W T F S S
       1
2 34 5 678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30