(no subject)

Date: 25/6/13 17:49 (UTC)
That still comes off as legislating. Congress asked that question in 2006 and compiled 15,000 pages of documents in evidence for renewal. SCOTUS said section 5 is Constitutional, meaning it IS okay to require some jurisdictions to face higher levels of scrutiny than others. But then they said section 4 is unconstitutional essentially because it is old.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Credits & Style Info

Talk Politics.

A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods


MONTHLY TOPIC:

Failed States

DAILY QUOTE:
"Someone's selling Greenland now?" (asthfghl)
"Yes get your bids in quick!" (oportet)
"Let me get my Bid Coins and I'll be there in a minute." (asthfghl)

June 2025

M T W T F S S
       1
2 34 5 678
910 1112 131415
1617 1819 202122
23242526272829
30