We don't need the Supreme Court to tell us that the newspaper can do that in order to know that they can.
Really? So if a newspaper prints an editorial that reveals information that is sensitive to national security, like revealing a double agent (which has happened), or presents a credible threat to the President (which is a crime), We the Amateurs are going to be the ones who decide the liability? I don't think so.
Credits & Style Info
Talk Politics. A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Date: 13/6/13 17:35 (UTC)Really? So if a newspaper prints an editorial that reveals information that is sensitive to national security, like revealing a double agent (which has happened), or presents a credible threat to the President (which is a crime), We the Amateurs are going to be the ones who decide the liability? I don't think so.